Jump to content
IGNORED

Murphy isn't done yet


birdshotnj

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, toxo said:

Do you REALLY vote for a candidate only because he or she is pro Hunting?  No other considerations of their views on other issues :confused:

 

He is anti-gun, That means anti hunting!, How about free college for illegals? How about sanctuary state? Everything he stands for is wrong!. For education? No he wants to hand out raises, that is all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, toxo said:

Do you REALLY vote for a candidate only because he or she is pro Hunting?  No other considerations of their views on other issues :confused:

 

You voted for this guy?  You voted for a guy who would take away your freedom to own guns or hunt?  That's such a horrible mindset.  People who want to rule and make you live just like them.  If you live a different way, they use the law to make you live their way.  It's sick.  

Believe me, when the government can take away such fundamental rights, they can take away anything.  You think he's going to stop at the bear hunt?  His same logic applies to deer and any other animal.  

If this guy can con even sportsmen into voting for him, we're all doomed.  Maybe after years and years of his whittling away your freedoms, taxing you, and increasing spending, NJ will go totally down the tubes and it can serve as some kind of warning for the rest of the country.  That's the only bright side to this whole thing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:shakehead:

9 hours ago, toxo said:

Do you REALLY vote for a candidate only because he or she is pro Hunting?  No other considerations of their views on other issues :confused:

 

Well, considering the fact that this site is devoted to hunting and fishing and the people engaged in it, I would say a person's view on hunting and firearms would be paramount in us voting for them or not.  Thankfully if they are supportive of hunting, firearms, sportsmen they are generally in agreement with everything else I am in agreement with.   Liberals/democrats/socialists are generally not supportive of more freedom in general and want as much control of my rights and money as they can get.  So that leaves me with no choice since the modern day democrat party are now dominated by extreme leftists. 

Edited by stratocaster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still say that this state needs to stop with the check in stations for bears!!! Look at the pictures that are put in these articles from the check in. Stop giving these idiots a place to go and protest ..if we don't give them a place to go and a place to give people a way to take these pictures of us  it may slow down alittle ...if you post pictures of bears with blood coming out  of their nose and mouth + some of Cubs, people who really don't care about  the hunt will start to care because they get all emotional over seeing things like that......why not just do what NY does and have us call them in and send the teeth in if we want to help f&g with their studies of these bears... Look at how many of these protesters are from out of state, they have no where to cry in their state so they come here to do it! Just my opinion 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, toxo said:

Do you REALLY vote for a candidate only because he or she is pro Hunting?  No other considerations of their views on other issues :confused:

 

The most important issue for me at this stage of my life is pro 2A and pro hunting, so my answer is ABSOLUTELY YES !!! And since I registered to vote at 18, I have only missed ONE school board election !!! And my children who are between 19-24 are all registered republicans, including my snowflake daughter.

"Well Behaved Women Seldom Make History" - Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

 

NJ State Federation of Sportsmen's Clubs Member
NRA Life Member

NWTF Women In The Outdoors Member

UBNJ Member



 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rgw said:

I am starting to believe most Republicans should register as democratic, this way we can vote the worse democratic to go again the best Republican.

Not a bad idea...though dangerous.  In NJ, the worst democrat would probably win the general election.  Maybe better to vote for the "least bad" democrat.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, dlist777 said:

Not a bad idea...though dangerous.  In NJ, the worst democrat would probably win the general election.  Maybe better to vote for the "least bad" democrat.....

Let me clarify, the one less likely to win general election

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, rgw said:

Let me clarify, the one less likely to win general election

I understood what you meant. 

I guess I'm just saying you never know what you get.  I feel like the liberal media pumped up Trump during the primaries because they thought he had no chance against Hillary.  In their opinion he was the least likely to win in the general election.  They ended out with their worst nightmare.  

The opposite can happen too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/22/2018 at 1:26 PM, toxo said:

Do you REALLY vote for a candidate only because he or she is pro Hunting?  No other considerations of their views on other issues :confused:

 

I love this!  Does it say anywhere that I voted for him? With all thats going on in the World and in America,If you vote for a candidate ONLY because he or she is pro-gun,pro-hunting with out knowing ALL that they stand for, you are narrow minded and selfish  a big part of whats wrong in this World,Me,Me,Mine,Mine..................

 

Edited by Dinger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...