Jump to content
IGNORED

NJ Handgun Ammunition Registry

DJ0808
 Share

Recommended Posts

thefirstndsecond 8 pointer

thefirstndsecond

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, BowhunterNJ said:

Funny how intent matters in the legal system, except when our gov does it.  Clearly the intent is tied to tracking guns along with ammo.  

What is the law regarding a registry?

FPC  - "Without either the first or second amendment, we would have no liberty; the first allows us to find out what's happening, the second allows us to do something about it! The second will be taken away first, followed by the first and then the rest of our freedoms." - Andrew Ford
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Haskell_Hunter
Haskell_Hunter

Just bought 1000 rounds of 9mm pistol ammo from GunBroker.  Seller is from PA. NJ politicians can go to hell.

Bucksnbows
Bucksnbows

You don’t know @Haskell_Hunter like I do. If he took up reloading, there would be a foundry at his house where he would melt down brass and form it into new cartridges. And that’s just for starters.

BowhunterNJ
BowhunterNJ

@Haskell_Hunter at home...  

Posted Images

Bucksnbows 11 pointer

Bucksnbows

Posted
Posted
On 7/1/2022 at 10:45 AM, DJ0808 said:

These new laws are nuts and a straight slap in the face of Bruen. 

Seriously is there no means by which they could be held in contempt of SCOTUS???

Just seems to me that if a court says don't do that to you or me, then we try to play games with a judge(s) order, that court would immediately come down hard on us. Why doesn't the same apply to state legislators or governors???

Not that I could see current DOJ doing anything in this case....

Because they are not in direct violation of the Court ruling on Bruen.  These new laws will be challenged and likely overturned, but it has to go through the Courts.  If NJ or NY said "screw you" to SCOTUS and didn't change "may issue" to "shall issue" which the Bruen case settled, then they would be in contempt.  

https://www.troutscapes.com/

https://nativefishcoalition.org/national-board

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...