Who do you like for a presidential candidate and why?

[MackofallTrades]

The Fountain Head

 

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

[MackofallTrades]

Atlas Shrugged

 

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

[MackofallTrades]

In.That.Order

 

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

[BowhunterNJ]

HH maybe Mcafee is your guy!

 

http://www.businessinsider.com/john-mcafee-ill-decrypt-san-bernardino-phone-for-free-2016-2

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Haskell_Hunter]

HH maybe Mcafee is your guy!

 

http://www.businessinsider.com/john-mcafee-ill-decrypt-san-bernardino-phone-for-free-2016-2

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I was waiting for that to somehow come back and bite me in the arse.

 

Hells no!  That guy is a loon!

 

I'm considering using my name as a write-in.

[BowhunterNJ]

Hahaha

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[overtimehunter]

cruz is the only one who has even tried to do anything about the broken system of backroom deals and d.c.  insider games. he even calls out weak leadership in his own party!. I don't trust trump. I feel he will say anything to get the nomination. his statements and donation history to libs like shumer , ried , Clinton, mcconnel all scare me . Rubio is very good but again he lost me with the gang of 8 and I can never trust him .   all the republicans are better then the dems  but only cruz is the real deal... actions speak louder then words.

[Axiom]

 

Thats how we got Cigar smoking Billy Clinton, whom used a nice young niave intern as a cigar humidor, among other things.

 

 

   

 

Ehem, That was pretty funny.. But, I have to disagree with the "niave" thing.. The intern was a grown women. She knew exactly what she was doing. She was screwing around with the president of the united states.. Beats hook'n up with some drunk'n plumber  at some dive bar  guess..    

Edited February 20, 2016 by Axiom

[Axiom]

 

Axiom - I tend to agree with you, just a little less vehemently.  I caution you to think about your perspective though.  Today's Republican party would be viewed as socialist by the populace as little as 60 years ago.  No argument, just food for thought.

 

Hey man no need to caution me.. I'm not in love with the Republicans.. I'm a registered independent voter, Not affiliated with any party nor do i intend to be..  However given the choice between Democrats and Republicans, in recent history, Republicans are the far better of the two evils .. At least at the presidential level..

[Haskell_Hunter]

Trigger warning:  You might be a nerd or realize that you are one if you get this joke.

 

 

[BowhunterNJ]

HH more reading...

 

https://beinglibertarian.com/2016/02/19/why-sane-libertarians-are-voting-donald-trump/

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Haskell_Hunter]

I stopped reading after the second paragraph.  Complete bulls!t.  The analogy is hollow.  Read the comments below the article.

 

There is also a difference between libertarian and Libertarian.  I am a small "L".  The whole article is about political parties and it make a shitty attempt to consign all libertarians as conservatives, which is complete crap.  The author has no idea what libertarianism is about.  He thinks it's about no taxes, which is crap.  Libertarians are about free markets, which if he actually knew anything about, would stunt his whole argument that libertarians are anti-business.  Hardly, we are the most pro-business pro-liberty pro-free market group out there.

 

A better analog is, "You can take the rickety elevator with the Republicans, but you have to listen to and believe their lies while on the elevator and you have less freedoms--it's the same rickety elevator as the Democrats except it's not blue--or you can retain your constitutional freedoms and take the stairs with the libertarians to get to the next floor."

 

It might take longer, but I'll take the stairs.

[Haskell_Hunter]

Oh, and the author of that piece of crap article referenced this nut job to paint libertarians as anti-GMO:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_M._Smith

 

To quote the nut job's bio on Wikipedia:  "Bruce Chassy, a molecular biologist and food scientist, wrote to the show arguing that Smith's "only professional experience prior to taking up his crusade against biotechnology is as a ballroom-dance teacher, yogic flying instructor, and political candidate for the Maharishi cult’s natural-law party." Jon Entine, a author and science journalist, accused Smith of being "an activist with no scientific or medical background" and said that Smith's views amount to "near-hysterical criticism"."

 

I follow links deep into the web to find the nut jobs at the end.  How dare you post an inflammatory article about libertarians and not investigate every link in it!  Lest you forget whom you're dealing with here!    

[Haskell_Hunter]

Better article:  http://reason.com/blog/2016/02/19/why-donald-trump-and-hillary-clinton-are

 

"As Dowd points out, Trump and Clinton represent not the start of anything new or exciting in politics. They are instead the pothole-ridden cul de sac of the the past 15 years or more of instensely partisan and genuinely awful governing."

[Axiom]

Hardly, we are the most pro-business pro-liberty pro-free market group out there

 

 

 Oh so your a libertarian eh?..