Jump to content

BenedictGomez

NJW&W Members
  • Content Count

    1,809
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

33 Excellent

About BenedictGomez

  • Rank
    11 Pointer
  • Birthday 09/15/1955

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • County, State
    Hunterdon County, New Jersey

Recent Profile Visitors

457 profile views
  1. BenedictGomez

    Brett Kavanaugh Wild Teen

    My prediction? Dr. Ford is NOT going to testify Thursday. There'll be another "delay" by Democrats. Especially now that "female witness" came forward & says she has no idea what Ford's talking about. As all 4 of Ford's witnesses deny Ford's claim, the Dems wont allow her testimony, as the optics will be horrible. Also, there's rumors tonight that WaPo (which broke the story) has known that the female witness was a "NO" on this for a while now, and simply didnt report that publicly. If so, that's liberal journalistic bias at its' VERY WORST.
  2. BenedictGomez

    Brett Kavanaugh Wild Teen

    I'm gonna' wait until the facts come out to pass judgement. Miller claims the woman is a nut with a mental health history replete with restraining orders. We'll have to see. If he is guilty of this, however, it's jail time for sure.
  3. BenedictGomez

    Brett Kavanaugh Wild Teen

    If you change "gloves" for "wheels", then I'd maybe agree with you.
  4. BenedictGomez

    Brett Kavanaugh Wild Teen

    Go to any news source on planet earth and you'll see.
  5. BenedictGomez

    Brett Kavanaugh Wild Teen

    Correct. Except this time even REPUBLICANS and CONSERVATIVES agree with the media that Trump was an idiot. It's hard to get Republicans to side with the media, but hand it to Trump, he's done that. And that's not even taking into account the contents of his tweets this morning are moronic and tone deaf. This will only serve to alienate voters 45 days ahead a a MAJOR election.
  6. BenedictGomez

    Brett Kavanaugh Wild Teen

    Trump is such a ******** moron. That ignorant douche just helped Ford & Democrats November election hopes more than 1000 liberal media outlets could ever dream. SMH
  7. If you repeat something often enough, people DO start to believe it, even if it's false. I'm sure you've heard on TV news 1000 times that, "undocumented immigrants commit fewer crimes than native born citizens", on CNN or NBC or XYZ liberal network. This has never seemed demographically logical to me, because those who come here are much poorer than the median citizen, and it's demographic fact that poor people are more likely to commit crime regardless of which race they represent. Well, here you go..............
  8. BenedictGomez

    Brett Kavanaugh Wild Teen

    I think the fact she doesnt know WHERE it happened is even more astounding than the "when" part. Amazingly, she cant remember any detail that would be useful to verify whether or not she's telling the truth. Funny how that happens.
  9. BenedictGomez

    Got my First Elk 9/11/18

    I was there hiking & biking last month. Highly recommend the Bloods Lake to Lake Lackawaxen hike for a short one (only takes about 2 hours), or with just a little more time scramble up Clayton Peak from there for a 360 degree view.
  10. BenedictGomez

    Brett Kavanaugh Wild Teen

    How positively not shocking that after YESTERDAY saying she would testify, today she LITERALLY adopts the DNC suggested strategy of delaying until after a complete FBI investigation. That FBI investigation, by the way, would not be complete until AFTER the November election, which odds suggests Dems have a 30% chance of taking the senate. All this is is a delay hail mary pass in the slight hopes Dems beat the odds and take the Senate, in which case, they would delay the SCOTUS vote for 2 full years believing Trump loses in 2020, and then they get a Liberal SCOTUS judge rather than Kavanaugh.
  11. BenedictGomez

    Brett Kavanaugh Wild Teen

    I find it odd: 1) She claims there were 5 other people at the party, but the only 2 she remembers were Judge & Kavanaugh, but NONE of the other 3 girls (who would presumably been her actual acquaintances). That's convenient, because they cant be interviewed 2) The other guy she DOES remember (Judge) has written a book about being an alcoholic, in which he names a character "Kavanaugh" who passes out drunk at a party. That's convenient, lends credibility to she story. Though that guy (Judge) claims this assault charge is crazy and denies it 3) She is a liberal activist who attends left-wing protests, donates to the DNC & Bernie Sanders (Socialist), signed an anti-Trump letter (and hey, drives a hybrid car & eats organically to boot lol). 4) She doesn't know WHOSE house she was at. REALLY?!?!?!?!?!? That's convenient, because they cant be interviewed to see if there EVER even WAS a party. 5) She doesn't know HOW she got to the party that night. That's convenient, because remember she's only 15 at the time and cant drive, so that driver cant be interviewed to see if there EVER even WAS a party. 6) She doesn't know how she got home that night. Was it too far to walk? If so, WHO took you home from the party? Again, another person who may have to "exist" whom cannot be interviewed. 7) The therapists' notes claim she said she was sexually assaulted by FOUR boys, but now she says it was only Kavanaugh, with Judge watching. Gosh, that sounds like a pretty freaking BIG mistake for the therapist to make. If I can figure the above out with the little bits I've read today, I'm sure Lindsay Graham could tear her apart on examination. Sadly, he's too nice. I wish they could bring Trey Gowdy over from the House, because that S.O.B. would have no mercy on her.
  12. This is a good short read. You hear liberals and left-wing politicians cite this "study" all the time. I just heard Diane Feinstein cite it Wednesday during the Kavanaugh hearing. How a Botched Study Fooled the World About the U.S. Share of Mass Public Shootings: U.S. Rate is Lower than Global Average Abstract A paper on mass public shootings by Adam Lankford (2016) has received massive national and international media attention, getting coverage in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, plus hundreds of other news outlets spanning at least 35 different countries. Lankford’s claim was that over the 47 years from 1966 to 2012, an enormous amount of the world’s mass public shooters -- 31% -- occurred in the United States. Lankford attributed this to America’s gun ownership. Lankford claims to have “complete” data on such shooters in 171 countries. However, because he has neither identified the cases nor their location nor even a complete description on how he put the cases together, it is impossible to replicate his findings. It is particularly important that Lankford share his data because of the extreme difficulty in finding mass shooting cases in remote parts of the world going back to 1966. Lack of media coverage could easily lead to under-counting of foreign mass shootings, which would falsely lead to the conclusion that the U.S. has such a large share. Lankford’s study reported that from 1966 to 2012, there were 90 public mass shooters in the United States and 202 in the rest of world. We find that Lankford’s data represent a gross undercount of foreign attacks. Our list contains 1,448 attacks and at least 3,081 shooters outside the United States over just the last 15 years of the period that Lankford examined. We find at least fifteen times more mass public shooters than Lankford in less than a third the number of years. Even when we use coding choices that are most charitable to Lankford, his 31 percent estimate of the US’s share of world mass public shooters is cut by over 95 percent. By our count, the US makes up less than 1.43% of the mass public shooters, 2.11% of their murders, and 2.88% of their attacks. All these are much less than the US’s 4.6% share of the world population. Attacks in the US are not only less frequent than in other countries, they are also much less deadly on average. Given the massive U.S. and international media attention Lankford’s work has received, and given the considerable impact his research has had on the debate, it is critical that this issue be resolved. His unwillingness to provide even the most basic information to other researchers raises real concerns about Lankford’s motives. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3238736
  13. BenedictGomez

    Recall Booker

    Booker looks like a tool given the documents he "heroically" released were already publicly cleared several hours prior.
  14. BenedictGomez

    HOW MANY ARROWS/BOLTS DO YOU CARRY IN YOUR QUIVER

    Carry = 3 Most shot = 1
  15. Just an FYI to anyone here who still buys Levi jeans and/or clothing, Levi Straus is now donating to anti-gun groups & "partnering with Everytown for Gun Safety and Michael Bloomberg" https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/4/levi-strauss-launches-gun-control-initiative-we-si/