NJ Bill to require FPIC and Handgun P2P background checks for everyone in the household over 18

[hostak126]

 

https://www.news2a.com/new-jersey/nj-assembly-introduces-bill-requiring-background-checks-for-all-household-members/

Bill number A5210

https://www.njleg.state.nj.us/bill-search/2024/A5210/bill-text?f=A5500&n=5210_I1

[Jim_]

They have too much time on their hands ... just trying to come up with stupid stuff like this.

[vdep217]

It's a useless look at me law.  Already happens.  You have to list those who reside with you already. I know someone who's father had a felony they lived with.  They had to appeal the denial and prove that their father wouldn't have access to the safe combo

[bowguide]

yet another waste of time & money

[Sako76]

Murphy, another POS democrat!  The Gestapo would be proud of her!

[hostak126]

First come registration, followed by confiscation, lastly extermination

[smittty]

What scares me is what next after that. Maybe having to screen you house guesses. IFB

[MGHunter66]

2 hours ago, vdep217 said:

You have to list those who reside with you already.

Never heard of that, I have both FID and pistol permit and never had to list who resides with me🤷‍♂️

[vdep217]

2 hours ago, MGHunter66 said:

Never heard of that, I have both FID and pistol permit and never had to list who resides with me🤷‍♂️

I thought it was in there u may be correct.  But i know 2 people who were denied for people living with them that have felonies

[Bucndoe]

6 hours ago, vdep217 said:

It's a useless look at me law.  Already happens.  You have to list those who reside with you already. I know someone who's father had a felony they lived with.  They had to appeal the denial and prove that their father wouldn't have access to the safe combo. 

Absolute nonsense and 100 percent incorrect. Another case of Simone Adamley quoting NJ Firearms and Weapons Laws

 

Edited January 29 by Bucndoe

[vdep217]

44 minutes ago, Bucndoe said:

Absolute nonsense and 100 percent incorrect. Another case of Simone Adamley quoting NJ Firearms and Weapons Laws

 

So here's a question.  I know 2 people who were denied based on their father having a felony .  They had to appeal and prove that father wouldn't have access..  I already said that I was wrong  it's not on the form.

 How were they denied or why

Edited January 29 by vdep217

[Bucndoe]

2 hours ago, vdep217 said:

So here's a question.  I know 2 people who were denied based on their father having a felony .  They had to appeal and prove that father wouldn't have access..  I already said that I was wrong  it's not on the form.

 How were they denied or why

That's a question you should be asking them and hope that they are telling you all the facts and not leaving out some embarrassing details

[Bonefreak]

2 hours ago, vdep217 said:

So here's a question.  I know 2 people who were denied based on their father having a felony .  They had to appeal and prove that father wouldn't have access..  I already said that I was wrong  it's not on the form.

 How were they denied or why

Could have been if the firearms were seized for a restraining order, mental health crisis, TERPO, etc and upon those issues being resolved, a firearm return was denied by the local prosecutors office and the owner had to prove the household member w a disqualification had no access to the firearms. Or maybe he had to do a change of address for his FID to live at his fathers house and the SP had records of his father with a felony.  There’s more details to their issues why they were denied. 

Edited January 30 by Bonefreak

[rem870hunter1]

They are soooo desperate and willing to do anything. These better not make it through.

[hostak126]

8 hours ago, MGHunter66 said:

Never heard of that, I have both FID and pistol permit and never had to list who resides with me🤷‍♂️

There's nothing on the NJSP forms about listing others along with their information in the FPIC or P2P applications.

29 minutes ago, rem870hunter1 said:

They are soooo desperate and willing to do anything. These better not make it through.

You're right! this is just another attempt to make something stick and use our tax dollars against us. They will lose, but they're going to keep trying anything to beat Bruen and any other Pro 2A lawsuits we will eventually win.