Who's good at aging deer by teeth.

[Bowhunter444]

Here is the jawbone from my deer I shot Saturday night my guess is 4 1/2 years old. He had a 20 1/2" inside spread.

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

[beaverman]

Need a top view to tell anything

[3Blade]

I cant help you there, but congrats on a great buck

[Rusty]

Need a top view to tell anything

 

What he said. 

[Piney commando]

Check out deerage.com it will show you how to accurately age a deer to 2 1/2 years old after that without doing the research they do on your seers 2 bottom front teeth you are just guessing. Check it out it's very cool and informative.

[Piney commando]

http://www.deerage.com/aging-deer/

[jerseywhitetails]

thats a good guess

[JHbowhunter]

send the front lower incisors to deerage.com and get the most accurate result. The buck is probably 2.5 to 6.5 years old, but all I could do with any degree of accuracy is give you that 4 year range.   Congrats on a good one... I am pending result on a buck I shot with bow that I believe could be 6.5 (or older), based on trail cam history, but his teeth looked about like yours.

[outdoorslife]

send the front lower incisors to deerage.com and get the most accurate result. The buck is probably 2.5 to 6.5 years old, but all I could do with any degree of accuracy is give you that 4 year range.   Congrats on a good one... I am pending result on a buck I shot with bow that I believe could be 6.5 (or older), based on trail cam history, but his teeth looked about like yours.

Tripod did appear to be an older deer judging from your pics and history you shared with us

[Buck154]

Go online and check Deerage.com and send the teeth in. Going by rhe teeth I would guess probably 3.5...I had the jaw out of a wide 8 a few years ago and had a lot more wear on his teeth and he was 5.5 (checked by deerage.com).

[Buck154]

 

The one on the left is from my 5.5 year oldand the other is from a big body 2.5 year

[Bowhunter444]

Here is the top pic of the jawbone I'm gonna bring it to the deer biologist when I see them on the 20th see what they think.

 

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

[Rusty]

[Rusty]

3 or 4,  I think I'd agree with you at 4.  

[beaverman]

Leveled off on the back section of last molar, sharp peaks still present on all molars, less dentin exposure than enamel on all molars.  Unless he's been eating soft mast I would guess 3.5.  Not much wear for it to be older than that but it really depends on diet.