Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I was fortunate enough to be on the state's Executive Committee that made these recommended changes.  The old Plan was more than a little bit cumbersome which rendered it largely useless.  We decided rather than focus on the individual needs of more than 400 individual separate animal species to rather look at imperiled habitat types that make up the majority of where these threatened and endangered species or species of special concern live.  Certain habitats like early successional forest encompass large numbers of song birds and other animals for example.  Same for coldwater habitat like trout streams which harbor some endangered fish species but also provide aquatic insects critical to the survival of our disappearing bats, freshwater muscles, bald eagles that eat the trout and suckers, otters that do the same and so on.  Native eelgrass habitat was yet another type to focus effort on as are others.

 

Not only are all states required to update their plans, but the Plan itself needs to be user friendly so that the Division and Parks and Forestry as well as conservation organizations can better focus our efforts to improve habitat for imperiled species.  

Edited by Bucksnbows

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...