Jump to content
IGNORED

2021 BLACK BEAR SEASON CLOSED


FeniQuest217

Recommended Posts

I'll take a silver lining here - let them cancel the entire hunt this year and then let's see how many bears invade people's space up there. Last year a lot of bears were culled even only on private land so the numbers were still somewhat kept in check. This year - not a single bear will be culled - I can't wait to see the numbers and all the complaints coming. Just pray that nobody gets killed like that kid from Rutgers.  This may be a chance for the science to play out - then we'll can say to all the so-called science lovers "Where was 'follow the science' this time???"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, mazzgolf said:

I'll take a silver lining here - let them cancel the entire hunt this year and then let's see how many bears invade people's space up there. Last year a lot of bears were culled even only on private land so the numbers were still somewhat kept in check. This year - not a single bear will be culled - I can't wait to see the numbers and all the complaints coming. Just pray that nobody gets killed like that kid from Rutgers.  This may be a chance for the science to play out - then we'll can say to all the so-called science lovers "Where was 'follow the science' this time???"

It will make no difference. We went for years without bear hunt and now even if there are conflicts the libs will report alternative news the way they do with everything else. Last year one guy was attacked and hurt  in his own garage and the governor argued it was only bear encounter, not attack. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As hunters we can not let "the science" alone dictate what is done or not done with controlling animal populations.  Be assured anti hunting groups are working hard on "the science" to manage animal populations by non lethal methods.  Don't think that NJ won't spend 10's of millions of dollars neutering, darting with contraceptives etc, if that is what "the science" says could be effective, and scrap hunting altogether.

Edited by Nomad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nomad said:

As hunters we can not let "the science" alone dictate what is done or not done with controlling animal populations.  Be assured anti hunting groups are working hard on "the science" to manage animal populations by non lethal methods.  Don't think that NJ won't spend 10's of millions of dollars neutering, darting with contraceptives etc, if that is what "the science" says could be effective, and scrap hunting altogether.

The liberal Cesspool of Staten Island is paying over $3million/year for deer vasectomy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The F W Council approved the new CBBMP months ago.  They knew when they voted for and passed it that there wouldnt be a bear hunting season this year they just didn't mention it.

Hunters shot a bear people named Pedals.  It walked on its hind legs becauae of a missing paw or paws or something else was wrong.  People were outraged!  Murphy is kissing butt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My late Girlfriend- Patti encountered far too many Black Bears when she lived at the Great Gorge Townhouses in Vernon.

  Bears came down the mountain every night to raid the Bins along with Racoons.

  Residents were afraid to walk to their cars after dark...

Open The Black Bear Hunt!!!

Take The Multiple Use Area Challenge. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Lunatic said:

The liberal Cesspool of Staten Island is paying over $3million/year for deer vasectomy 

https://www.silive.com/news/2021/03/city-releases-new-data-on-controversial-staten-island-deer-vasectomy-program-is-it-working.html

Quote

"According to the city’s report, the total deer population went from an estimated 2,053 in project year one (from 2016 to 2017) to an estimated 1,555 in project year 4 (from 2019 to 2020), but there have long been questions about the accuracy of the deer counts. ...Using vasectomy to address the borough’s growing deer population ... was initially slated to cost $3.3 million, but doubled to $6.6 million last year."

They paid 6.6 million just to reduce the number of deer by 498. That means they spent $13,200 per deer. :headscratch: Why SPEND money when you could MAKE it and have hunters PAY the city a permit fee? Guaranteed they could have reduced the number of deer by 500 in just ONE year (not the 3)... plus, hunters culling the deer will immediately help with car collisions, environment damage, and the spread of lyme disease (after all, a "fixed" deer can still spread ticks, still eat forest undergrowth, and still get hit by a car - a dead deer does not do any of those things!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...