POACHED TARGET BUCK DOWN!!!!

[BowhunterNJ]

Let's keep the topics on track about this situation/issue.  If it diverts to something else, start a new topic (i.e. Hunting rights vs Deer Ownership)

[rocky]

6 minutes ago, BowhunterNJ said:

Let's keep the topics on track about this situation/issue.  If it diverts to something else, start a new topic (i.e. Hunting rights vs Deer Ownership)

Who the hell do you think you are?

Are you trying to change how the internet works single handedly on us?

Oops my bad, I guess I will need to start a new thread.  Carry on.

 

[BowhunterNJ]

It's all good to discuss different things, but that's what different topics are for.  Otherwise this turns into a muddled mess of a topic and we divert from the original issue

[rocky]

5 minutes ago, BowhunterNJ said:

It's all good to discuss different things, but that's what different topics are for.  Otherwise this turns into a muddled mess of a topic and we divert from the original issue

Amen my friend, like trying to herd cats with firecrackers!

[mazzgolf]

I'm laughing at the tags that were put on this thread:

"ILLEGAL"

"POACHER"

"POACHED"

I wasn't aware we had a lot of poaching threads here that require new labels to identify them as such 

[Lunatic]

20 minutes ago, BowhunterNJ said:

It's all good to discuss different things, but that's what different topics are for.  Otherwise this turns into a muddled mess of a topic and we divert from the original issue

I don't think you could show me one single thread with more than 20 posts that stayed exclusively on subject. I am personally OK with it because every one of us has ability to pick and choose to what we reply to.

[BowhunterNJ]

34 minutes ago, Lunatic said:

I don't think you could show me one single thread with more than 20 posts that stayed exclusively on subject. I am personally OK with it because every one of us has ability to pick and choose to what we reply to.

I know who to blame for that in most instances too!

[BowhunterNJ]

43 minutes ago, mazzgolf said:

I'm laughing at the tags that were put on this thread:

"ILLEGAL"

"POACHER"

"POACHED"

I wasn't aware we had a lot of poaching threads here that require new labels to identify them as such 

I was just trying to "enhance" the Google ranking with a few keyword tags

[kanigie]

1 hour ago, CJ3a said:

I would just clean up the thread. We need to keep Joe’s name trending. 

Already a couple results down when you google Joe Ciottariello.

 

 

[tcook8296]

5 hours ago, dlist777 said:

Agree 100%.  This is such a classic internet argument. 

• Lunatic says something. 
• DV1 takes it out of context, twists it, changes it into something Lunatic wasn't even saying. 
• Then DV1 argues Lunatic is an ahole for saying it. 
• Then, when confronted, he keeps arguing against a point that NO ONE MADE....instead of saying: 'my bad, i misunderstood what he meant.'  

Of course, add in a few statements about how the readers are too dense to get his point.  

 

Omg hes a democrat lol

[Haskell_Hunter]

Don't lock this thread!  It boosts site traffic and generates ad revenue!

[Hunter115522]

No reason at all to lock the thread. We need to keep it towards the top for as long as possible.

[mazzgolf]

Is it true this is him after he got caught? from here

[BowhunterNJ]

Oh wow, didn't even realize it was the same shirt!

[Tarhunt]

I like his middle finger.